A word from Deloitte

Our research agenda

The Deloitte Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship supports a wide research agenda – we believe that anyone in any role within an organisation can conceive and drive innovation, and that new entrepreneurial ventures can be based on an equally diverse range of opportunities. Rather than setting out any fixed research agenda we support any faculty member in any subject area approaching the topics of innovation and entrepreneurship from any direction.

All the research we support is submitted for publication in the top academic journals. However, we want all research findings to be accessible and useful to managers, leaders and entrepreneurs. The Institute supports dissemination of research findings and insights in a range of media through this website. 

Current research projects

September 2013

 

Michaël Bikard
Assistant Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

Organisations and the Division of Innovative Labour: Refinement and Development of the “Knowledge Twins” Method

Do different types of organisations play distinct roles in the process of science-based invention? Universities, entrepreneurial firms and larger companies all play a part in the translation of scientific knowledge into new technologies. Yet the nature of this role remains unclear. Does science-based invention occur in different ways when undertaken by different types of organisations? In order to understand the impact of different types of organisations on the translation of scientific knowledge into new technologies, I have proposed a novel empirical strategy. I use simultaneous discoveries in science to conduct the first “twin studies” of new scientific knowledge. The goal of this project is to refine and develop this method using interviews and computer programing.

Alex Edmans
Professor of Finance

Equity Vesting and Managerial Myopia

This paper links the impending vesting of a CEO’s equity to reductions in innovation. Existing studies measure the manager’s short-term concerns using the sensitivity of his equity to the stock price. However, in myopia theories, the driver of short-termism is not the magnitude of incentives but their horizon: equity will not induce myopia if it has a long vesting period. We use recent changes in compensation disclosure to introduce a new empirical measure that is tightly linked to theory - the stock-price sensitivity of shares and options vesting over the upcoming year. This sensitivity is determined by equity grants made several years prior, and thus unlikely to be driven by current investment opportunities. An interquartile increase in the sensitivity of newly-vesting equity is associated with a decline of 0.11% in the growth of R&D (scaled by total assets), 37% of the average R&D growth rate. Similar results hold when including advertising and capital expenditure. In addition, CEOs with newly-vesting equity are significantly more likely to meet or beat analyst earnings forecasts by a narrow margin.

The Real Costs of Disclosure

In the recent financial crisis, there have been widespread calls to increase firms’ disclosure requirements to maximise transparency. Our paper highlights an important cost to increasing disclosure – it may reduce innovation and long-term investment. Such projects improve the firm’s value in the long-run, but reduce earnings in the short-run. Thus, mandating increased disclosure of short-term, tangible measures of performance, will reduce the manager’s incentives to engage in long-term, intangible investment. Advocates of disclosure argue that the actual act of disclosure is costless – nowadays, information can be disclosed electronically rather than being physically mailed to shareholders. Our model points out that, even if the actual act of disclosure is costless, mandating increased disclosure can still be costly as it dissuades innovation. This result has important implications for public policy.

Elias Papaioannou
Associate Professor

The Effects of Land Mines on Development and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Mozambique

Unexploded land mines and other explosive war remnants pose a serious on-going threat to civilians across many parts of the developing world. Besides the sizable death toll and injuries, land mines hamper entrepreneurial activity, impede trade both within and across regions, and limit human capital accumulation by lowering school attendance. The ensuing isolation of the communities circulated by minefields exacerbates poverty and underdevelopment.

In this project, Elias Papaioannou and Stelios Michalopoulos assess the effects of land-mines on development and entrepreneurial activity combining detailed maps with geo-referenced micro-level data from Mozambique, a country that has been hugely affected by land mines installed by all conflict actors during the civil war (1977-1992). The analysis assesses both the long-run effects of land mines installed during the civil war on contemporary development and the short/medium run effects of recent de-mining activities. Using tools from network analysis and spatial econometrics, and a plethora of survey and census data on health, education, trade, entrepreneurship, and output the research aims identifying both the local and the nationwide impact of land mines.

Rui Silva
Assistant Professor of Finance

Personal Wealth and Entrepreneurship

Recent research on venture capital and private equity has helped shed light on the important role that finance plays in fostering entrepreneurship and innovation. However, the extent to which personal financial conditions - initial personal and family wealth -may act as catalysts for entrepreneurial activity has not received much attention. Many of today’s corporate champions such as Amazon, Apple, Disney, and Google had humble beginnings, starting out in garages, with much of the initial financing originating from personal funds as well as funds from family and friends. Without the initial support from close social connections many successful firms may not have taken off in the first place.

The main purpose of this project is to quantify the importance of initial financial conditions of individuals and their close relatives (e.g., being born into a well-off family) for entrepreneurship. Initial wealth may provide crucial earliest-stage funding for ventures that may not qualify yet for other sources of finance, or for which other sources of funding are prohibitively expensive. Further, initial wealth endowments may hasten entrepreneurial activity by providing individuals with a safety net---and perhaps a fair dose of necessary hubris---to engage in risky entrepreneurial activity rather than to pursue the relative safety of salaried employment.

Keyvan Vakili
Assistant Professor of Strategy & Entrepreneurship

Spilling Over the Berlin Wall: The Role of Mobility in Academic Knowledge Transfer

Several studies have highlighted the importance of employee mobility as a channel for knowledge transfer or knowledge spill-over. An implicit assumption behind these studies is that knowledge is sticky (or tacit) and thus acquiring it requires direct contact with the holder of such knowledge – to access the knowledge you may need to hire those who have created it or who have been in direct contact with the creators.

Taking advantage of a unique historical event, namely the fall of the Berlin Wall, I directly test this assumption. In particular I compare the amount of ‘knowledge spill-over’ (measured in terms of scientific citations) due to the movement of German scientists from West Germany to East Germany and vice versa after the fall of the Berlin Wall across two domains of knowledge: mathematics and chemistry. The idea is that, in contrast to chemistry, there is little tacit knowledge in the field of mathematics. Hence, this comparison lets me isolate the role of knowledge stickiness in explaining the knowledge spill-over due to employee mobility. It also enables me to test other mechanisms that can potentially lead to previously observed ‘citation premiums’ (an increase in the number of citations due to employee mobility). The results can make important contributions to the literatures on employee mobility, organizational learning, and knowledge spill-overs.

Freek Vermeulen
Associate Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

Who Gets it Wrong? Explaining Erroneous Market Perceptions Among Entrepreneurs in Champagne

Entrepreneurs use information about the markets in which they operate as input for their strategic decisions. However, they often get it wrong; their beliefs about various key features of the market regularly are inaccurate. For example, interviewing grape grower entrepreneurs in the Champagne industry, we noticed that their estimates of the average price in the market varied widely, with people both overestimating and underestimating market prices. The same was true for other pivotal variables in the industry.

We hope to explain who gets it wrong, how much, and in which direction. In first instance, we would like to focus on the market prices of Champagne grapes, because prices are a key variable and market characteristic, but also because there is a clear answer, i.e. the actual market price can – be it in hindsight – be determined.

This project is a follow-up study of an earlier project in we focused on the buyer side of the same market, i.e. Champagne houses. As a by-product from that work, 222 grape growers completed a questionnaire that we had used to validate some of the measures used in the paper on Champagne houses. We made use of the questionnaire to also collect data on several market perceptions of the grape growers; among others, of prices. Our interviews had already suggested that they often ‘get these variables wrong’. We now intend to collect objective data on (amongst others things) market prices. This data has only recently - several months after the harvest - become available. The gap between them – perception and reality – will be our dependent variable.

Naufel Vilcassim
Professor of Marketing

Co-Authors:

Stephen Anderson-MacDonald
Doctoral Student

Pradeep K. Chintagunta (Booth Business School, University of Chicago)
Professor of Marketing

Complementing Managerial Capital with Access to Information: A Field Experiment on International Consulting and Marketing versus Financial Information for Entrepreneurs in Uganda and Rwanda

This project explores a new approach to stimulating entrepreneurship in emerging markets. We use a randomised controlled-trial to measure the combined impact on firm performance of an innovation in management education – the GROW Movement “remote volunteer consulting” program – and a novel information technology tool that increases access to business information for a sample of “high-growth potential” entrepreneurs. By implementing a more intense intervention that focuses on only one aspect of business management (finance versus marketing), and combining this with improved access to business information, this research seeks to understand how innovation can unlock the growth potential of transformational micro-enterprises in developing countries.


February 2013

 

Julian Birkinshaw
Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship 

Organisational Responses to Technological Discontinuity in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Incumbent industry leaders, like Kodak or Nokia, struggle to respond effectively when faced with disruptive technologies. Various remedies to this ‘innovator’s dilemma’ have been proposed, including creating a separate unit in which the fledging technology can be nurtured, framing the new technology as an opportunity rather than a threat, and adopting a ‘fast second’ strategy to invest quickly once the way ahead is clear.

Birkinshaw’s research looks at the organisational response of big pharma companies to biotechnology – seen as a threat in the sense that it offers a potentially disruptive way of developing new drugs; and an opportunity in the sense that it has opened the eyes of big pharma companies to potentially superior ways of working. Companies took very different approaches when faced with these threats and opportunities. Some delayed taking decisive action; some chose to acquire what they were missing; some developed a ‘string of pearls’ (several smaller acquisitions); others took a more organic approach to ‘building’ the necessary capabilities.

The research will home in on those companies that have taken the most divergent courses of action. 

Dan Cable
Professor of Organisational Behaviour

The Role of Socialisation in Virtual Contracting: Innovating the Nature of Employment Relationships

The use if virtual contractors is a large and growing trend in the way work is completed in organisations and society more broadly. Given the combination of remote-location and temporary roles, where visibility and established trust is low, what is the best way to get virtual contractors up and running effectively? This investigation will examine how virtual contractors are welcomed to their ‘new organisation’ and how the initial factors of reputation, pay and socialisation affect their resulting work. In particular, Cable examines whether firms can use electronic socialisation to move the online relationship

Donal Crilly
Assistant Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

The Psycholinguistic Foundations of Entrepreneurship: Using Natural Language Processing to Understand the Mental Models of Entrepreneurs

According to research, entrepreneurs are more likely than corporate managers to identify opportunities. Crilly asks why this is the case? Are entrepreneurs merely more optimistic? A more intriguing explanation is that entrepreneurs and managers differ fundamentally in how they access and process information. To pinpoint the key differences, this research applies natural language processing to interviews with a carefully matched sample of entrepreneurs and managers. The focus lies in identifying the distinct mental connections that entrepreneurs and managers make between apparently unrelated domains such as printing and 3D. The findings hold the potential to inform both our understanding of what it means to be entrepreneurial and our teaching of entrepreneurship.

Oded Koenigsberg
Associate Professor of Marketing

Marco Bertini
Assistant Professor of Marketing

Managerial Biases in the Pricing of New Products

The authors look at the effect of the potential biases on managers’ pricing decisions of new products. This is a topic relevant for entrepreneurs and managers of innovative R&D departments who are emotionally invested in their products or organisations. Managerial biases can lead to poor pricing decisions and an inability to interpret early market signals – if things go badly, managers tend to blame the market for under-cutting and if things go well then they credit this to the superior performance of the product (rather than their own aggressive pricing). Bertini uses laboratory experiments and empirical (market) data analysis to capture these psychological biases. He follows this with an analytical model to learn the normative effects of such biases on the decisions in a variety of settings – and to develop testable hypotheses. Finally, these hypotheses will be tested using data collected from
market simulations and other market datasets.

Download this paper


September 2012

 

Jean-Pierre Benoit
Paul Geroski Term Chair Professor of Economics

Innovation in the Absence of Patents: Theory and Experiment 

Are patents really necessary to foster innovation? Benoit provides theoretical and experimental results presenting circumstances under which the absence of protection is more conducive to investment. When an innovator repeatedly faces the same parasitic imitators, Benoit first shows that any level of investment profitable under legal protection can be part of equilibrium in its absence: the parasites limit their imitation to preserve the innovator’s incentives to invest. Second, he shows that the innovator might invest more than under legal protection: he is forced to invest more to keep the parasites satisfied and thus cooperative. Experimental results confirm that subjects indeed invest more when protection does not exist and in a fashion consistent with the theory. 

Julian Birkinshaw
Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

Workplace Innovation: What Makes Them Stick?

This research focuses on how management innovations – new ways of working – take shape over time. There are many well-known management innovations that have had a profound influence on how companies work, including the multidivisional organisation structure ‘Six Sigma’ and ‘Business Process Reengineering’. But equally there are examples that have been less influential, such as ‘Cellular Manufacturing Teams’, or the ‘Spaghetti’ organisational model pioneered by Danish hearing aid company Oticon. Birkinshaw will examine recent management innovations – both the successes and failures – to understand what factors allow some to take off, whilst others do not. He will consider two dimensions to this question: there is a “technical” aspect in terms of the actual techniques and methods behind the innovation, and there is a “rhetorical” aspect in terms of how the ideas get communicated to business people, consultants and academics. Prior studies have given more attention to the technical aspects; in this study, the primary focus is on the rhetorical aspects. 

Rajesh Chandy
Professor of Marketing; Tony and Maureen Wheeler Chair in Entrepreneurship; Academic Director of the Deloitte Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Co-Authors:

Magda Hassan
Doctoral Student

Om Narasimhan (London School of Economics)
Professor of Marketing

Jaideep Prabhu (Judge Business School)
Jawaharlal Nehru Professor of Indian Business & Enterprise

Pricing Latitude and the Performance of Micro-Entrepreneurs

This research examines the economic and social impact of a change in the marketing practices of micro-entrepreneurs in a large emerging market. Chandy and his co-authors ask what impact the exercise of flexibility in pricing (a feature termed “pricing latitude”) has on the entrepreneur’s profitability using a sample of micro-entrepreneurs in a large slum in Cairo, Egypt. In this field experiment, they randomise whether micro-entrepreneurs are exposed or not to information from their successful peers’ pricing approaches. The impact of the intervention on both intermediate (e.g. changes in pricing practices) and final (e.g. profitability, sales) outcomes will be measured.

Woonam Hwang (PhD student, MSO)
Doctoral Student 

Nitin Bakshi
Assistant Professor of Management Science and Operations

Victor DeMiguel
Class of 2008 Term Professor of Management Science and Operations

When Simple Supply-Chain Penalty Clauses Suffice

Supplier reliability is an increasingly important aspect of global supply-chain management.
Disruptions to supply can be spectacular (volcanic eruption in Iceland) or seemingly more mundane (yet consequential) when retailers pursue on-time (just in time) delivery. Firms actively seek ways of enhancing supply reliability, but due to decentralisation of global supply chains they lack direct control, instead using contractual mechanisms to generate the right incentives for suppliers.

Whether capacity is wiped out completely or partially, or if the magnitude of disruption is proportional to order, size plays an important role in determining appropriate responses. An anecdotal scan of the contracting practices in the industry reveals the surprisingly widespread popularity of simple penalty contracts and not sophisticated mechanisms to coordinate supplier effort. The authors explore when simple penalty contracts suffice and when there is an imperative for more complex solutions.


February 2012

 

Rajesh Chandy
Professor of Marketing; Tony and Maureen Wheeler Chair in Entrepreneurship; Academic Director of the Deloitte Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Anja Lambrecht
Assistant Professor of Marketing

Co-authors:
Stephen Anderson-MacDonald
Doctoral Student

Om Narasimhan (London School of Economics)
Professor of Marketing

Enhancing the Productive Assets of Micro-Entrepreneurs in Emerging Markets: A Field Experiment on the Marketing of an Innovative Financial Product in Ghana

This research examines the economic and social impact of a novel financial product for micro-entrepreneurs in emerging markets. The authors ask whether untied loans (with no restrictions on how capital is spent or invested) or tied loans (where capital has to be invested into specific purpose) lead to better productivity and growth outcomes for microenterprises, and greater profitability for the financial services company offering the loans. Empirically, they designed and implemented a field experiment with a financial services company in Ghana. In the field experiment, they randomised whether micro-entrepreneurs were offered tied or untied loans. They then measured the impact of the type of loan on their business performance as well as on their relationship with the financial services company. 

Francesca Cornelli
Professor of Finance and Director of the Coller Institute of Private Equity  

Alexander Ljungqvistn (NYU Stern School of Business)
Ira Rennert Professor of Finance

Ownership and Influence

Growth equity investors, venture capitalists, and long-term shareholders provide growing companies with expertise as well as investment funding, yet they are often content with being minority shareholders themselves. This is surprising given the scope for strategic disagreement among investors about which growth options to pursue and the potential for conflicts of interest among the parties. Why then do large outside shareholders not insist on majority? Cornelli has developed an economic model that distinguishes between formal and real authority and shows under what circumstances majority ownership is necessary and efficiency-enhancing. She tests the model using detailed deal-level data from investments involving European growth equity investors.


September 2011
 

 

Stephen Anderson-MacDonald
Doctoral Student

Rajesh Chandy
Professor of Marketing; Tony and Maureen Wheeler Chair in Entrepreneurship

Michael Hay
Professor of Management Practice in Strategic and International Management and Entrepreneurship; Co-director, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor

Developing Managerial Capital: A Field Experiment on the Impact of Access to Business Skills for Entrepreneurs in South Africa

High growth rates in emerging markets have attracted increasing interest in these countries as firms seek new investment and expansion opportunities.  This interest stems from a belief that entrepreneurship can be an engine of growth.  However, entrepreneurs face substantial challenges in these markets.  Policy-makers have tended to focus on reducing capital constraints, for example through micro-finance initiatives, but there is little evidence that these solutions are the ‘miracle pills’ that can help micro and small entrepreneurs to scale-up their operations – at least, not if administered in isolation.  Researchers are now questioning what other forms of ‘capital’ are missing in emerging markets.

We argue that managerial capital – i.e., the skills associated with the management of customers, money, people, and operations – can be a key driver for helping micro and small enterprises to transition into larger firms.  We will examine the impact of ‘mini MBA’ training programs on the managerial capital of entrepreneurs in South Africa.  To isolate the causal effects of business skills training on firm performance, we will use a randomized controlled trial research design and assign 600 entrepreneurs into one of three groups: marketing/sales training; finance/accounting training; and a control group that does not receive any training.  This research design allows us to study the extent to which managerial capital development depends on the type of training received (marketing versus finance), entrepreneur-specific factors (e.g. mind-sets, endowments, backgrounds), and firm-specific factors (e.g. size, capital, product offerings).  The findings will assist managers of multinationals to determine whether, and when, business skills training impacts an entrepreneur’s  success in building robust and scalable ventures. 

Gary Dushnitsky
Associate Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

Measuring the Efficiency of Open Innovation Competitions

Established firms increasingly seek to innovate by harnessing ideas and talent that resides outside their boundaries. This trend, labelled Open Innovation (Chesbrough, 2003), takes various shapes and forms, including strategic alliances, corporate venture capital investments, and participation in innovation tournaments.  Innovation tournaments are a particularly novel form of Open Innovation strategy now receiving growing attention. Although extant work offers some insights regarding the output or winner of a tournament, we know little about tournament yield, namely the ratio of innovative inputs to outputs for a focal tournament. Second, most studies explore tournaments involving talented individuals, yet there is little evidence on the equally important company-targeted tournaments. The goal of this project is to understand the factors driving tournament efficiency.  To that end, the project will analyse proprietary data from a major tournament operating company that has led multiple tournaments across multiple sectors, including homeland security and others.

Benjamin L. Hallen
Assistant Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

Open Tournaments vs. Social Networks: A Study of the Impact of Venture Accelerators on Entrepreneurial Fundraising

Are some entrepreneurs constrained by their social networks and backgrounds when they seek to raise venture capital? Current theory offers competing answers to this question, with some theory emphasizing the inertia of social networks and other theory emphasizing their plasticity. However, empirical evidence is limited. We explore this question by examining the recent emergence of venture accelerators such as Y Combinator (Silicon Valley, CA), Techstars (Boulder, CO), and Seedcamp (Europe). In common with traditional Venture Capital (VC) firms, these accelerators offer funding, advice, and connections to entrepreneurs. They differ inasmuch as they have an open application processes - and offer less financial support. This research contrasts entrepreneurs who raise funds from accelerators with those initially funded by VCs. – and thus offer insight into whether accelerators ease access to capital for less-experienced and less-connected entrepreneurs.

Ioannis Ioannou
Assistant Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

George Serafeim
(Harvard Business School)
Assistant Professor of Business Administration

Robert Eccles
(Harvard Business School)
Professor of Management Practice

The Drivers of Corporate Social Innovation

In this project we explore which organizations engage in social innovation and why they do so. Social innovation refers to those product, process or business model innovations that are specifically designed to synergistically generate economic as well as environmental and social good. Social innovation is powerful because it harnesses the full power of profit-seeking businesses to invest in opportunities that tackle the world’s most acute challenges (e.g. climate change and global warming). We hope to provide a better understanding of how social and environmental issues are increasingly becoming embedded in the firms’ business models and the drivers for this trend.  We also examine whether, when and how such embeddedness creates economic, social and environmental impact. 

Michael G. Jacobides
Sir Donald Gordon Chair of Entrepreneurship and Innovation;
Associate Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

The Dark Side of Innovation: How Ingenious Change Corrupted Financial Services’ Stability

Since the fall of 2008, it has become clear that innovations that transformed the financial services sector were largely responsible for its near-meltdown and ensuing contraction. This project considers how innovations that aspired to shape the banking landscape actually ushered in an era of instability. It considers the systemic aspects of innovation, and asks how we should approach, or even regulate, innovation in sectors that so profoundly affect firms’ options – and people’s lives. This project aspires to capitalize on the research effort of the last three years, giving the “final push” in data gathering and paper preparation for one of the strategy field’s top journals.

Louise Mors
Assistant Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

Resistance to change and the effects on innovation

In this project we look at the extent to which managers are able to utilize their networks to resist senior management’s strategy. This is important because in most organizations there is a tendency to move towards exploitation of existing certainties rather than exploring new knowledge and ideas, which in turn lead to innovation. This is true even when senior management tries to implement changes to make the organization more innovative. While we know that individuals always resist change in organizations we know little from a theoretical perspective about how managers mobilise their networks. By shedding light on how managers utilize their networks to resist these forces for change, then perhaps we can think of ways to counter this resistance. We conduct our study using data on senior partners in a global management consultancy

Lourdes Sosa
Assistant Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship

Fiona Murray (MIT Sloan)
Associate Professor of Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management Associate Director, MIT Entrepreneurship Center Co-Head, TIES

James Utterback (MIT Sloan)
Professor of Management and Innovation
Professor of Engineering Systems

New firm formation in old technologies

As a general pattern, disruptive technologies are sources of entrepreneurial opportunity because the emergence of such technologies obsoletes incumbent firms’ capabilities.  Incumbent firms are forced to ‘milk’ old technologies while trying to ‘catch up’ with entrants populating the new technological space.  However, in some areas of the biotechnology revolution, a contrasting pattern is emerging: incumbent firms have been adapting, sometimes to competitive parity with entrants, and new firms are being founded to milk the old technology.  In this project, we look at the activity of such new firms with particular interest in their exit strategies.  If these firms consider the old technology as a stepping stone to the new, then they make an uncommon strategic choice: exposing themselves to the most common reason for incumbent firms’ demise by anchoring their core competences in the old technology. 

Vikrant Vig
London Business School Term Associate Professor of Finance

Does the source of capital affect entrepreneurial activity and innovation?

There seems to be a recent trend towards state ownership of banks. This paper attempts to investigate the implications of such a shift in financing for innovation activity and economic growth.

During the recent financial crisis, governments have been forced to take over large parts of the banking system through unprecedented bailouts of banks. Given this increase in state involvement in the banking sector there are genuine concerns in some quarters that state ownership of banks can have negative long-term implications for economic growth. The main argument is that state financing distorts the allocation of resources and prevents capital from freely flowing to most innovative projects.

In this project, we empirically examine how state ownership of banks affects entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. We then examine the inherent differences across these two types of ownership arrangements—state vs. private—and investigate what accounts for these differences (ex-ante screening, ex-post monitoring, contractual structure). I believe that a better knowledge of question is extremely important if one has to incorporate state ownership of banks into broader discussion on public policy.

Freek Vermeulen
Associate Professor of Strategic and International Management

Amandine Ody-Brasier
Doctoral Student

Overcoming barriers to innovation: examining the case of Champagne producers

In this project, we explore how firms in traditional industries experience and overcome institutional barriers to innovations. Innovations often generate some resistance among industry players with whom firms have developed crucial relationships, such as suppliers. In the Champagne industry, the supply of private labels is a business-model innovation that it strongly contested by suppliers, who see it as counter-normative. This project aims to provide a better understanding of how firms may overcome these barriers: we propose that suppliers’ social similarity with some firms leads them to hold inaccurate beliefs about how much they can trust these firms and how likely these firms are to adopt innovative practices. We test whether these mistaken beliefs on the part of suppliers play a major role in explaining why some firms were able to adopt this innovation while others couldn’t.

Gang Zhang
Doctoral Student

Conflict Resolution Strategies of Entrepreneurial Teams

Conflict resolution is crucial for the survival and success of the start-ups. However, little research has looked at how entrepreneurial teams resolve conflict, and no research has compared the relative effects of different conflict resolution strategies that entrepreneurial teams may use.

First I will study approximately ten entrepreneurial teams to gain a qualitative understanding of the range of conflict resolution strategies. Based on this I will develop a theory which I will then test on a broader base of entrepreneurial teams sourced via one of the entrepreneurship competitions, such as China UK Entrepreneurship Competition, Venture London Business Competition, and London Entrepreneurs’ Challenge. Finally, I will conduct an experiment at the Behavioural Research Lab of London Business School to establish causality for the theory.

By using this combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, I hope to be able to gain real insights into the kinds of conflict resolution strategies that the best teams use to perform – and thus help entrepreneurs better understand how to manage conflict effectively in their start-ups."


February 2011

 

Kevin Boudreau
Assistant Professor of Strategic and International Management

The Two-Sided Matching Behind the Creation of Movie-Video Game Alliances

Partnerships and alliances are becoming increasingly important in all innovative sectors but nowhere more so than in the technology, infrastructure and creative industries. Much has been written about how these relationships should be administered once they have been entered into, but less research has gone into how to pick the most appropriate business partner in the first place. And that can be a highly problematic exercise. Apart from simply identifying possible partners who bring “compatible” skills, there is the question of who is available and willing to join and who will make the best partner once the ink has dried. In this work, Boudreau examines how partnerships come to be formed in the videogame sector and what impact the tie-ups had on the profitability and competitiveness of both parties and concludes that going for the partner which may appear most obvious at first sight may not be the best option.

Stephen Anderson-MacDonald
Doctoral Student

Managerial Capital and Micro-Entrepreneurs

The micro-entrepreneur is a key player in the development of emerging markets both as a customer of goods and services from businesses in developed economies and as a distribution partner. Given this pivotal role, economic growth in those markets is dependent on the ability of micro-entrepreneurs to improve their businesses. And yet, many lack the managerial capital — defined as the skills associated with the management of customers, money, people and operations — to take their enterprises to the next level. In the proposed project, Anderson-Macdonald examines the business lives of micro-entrepreneurs at a more granular level and studies the impact of management training on economic outcomes in countries such as Ghana, India and South Africa.

Anja Lambrecht
Assistant Professor of Marketing

Paying with Money or With Effort: Pricing When Customers Anticipate Hassle

For many services, such as the Internet, or television, customers commit to a long-term contract with a firm spanning multiple time periods. Standard economic theory assumes that a customer evaluates payments and benefits at the contract level and is indifferent about the distribution of payments and benefits within a contract, so long as the total net discounted value of the contract remains the same. Lambrecht’s research demonstrates that hassle costs may prevent customers from entering into contracts or reduce their satisfaction with their existing provider. They will care when “hassle” (for example when setting up a service – installing a wireless network at home) occurs within a contract, and should prefer lower payments (e.g. discounts) at the time of higher hassle costs. If hassle occurs late in a contract, customers may prefer a discount at the time of hassle to an earlier discount that would otherwise be more attractive. It has important implications for firms on how to price contracts when customers anticipate hassle costs. 

Download this paper 

Brandon Lee
Assistant Professor of Strategic and International Management

Fences and gates: Standards organizations and the emergence and evolution of the U.S. organic food industry

Conventional wisdom has it that industry-level organisations, which construct and enforce various institutional rules, operate with Olympian detachment. In this paper, Lee challenges the notion that these organisations are neutral and independent, and investigates how values shape Standards-Based Certification Organisations (SBCOs). Following a multi-method study of the US organic food market, he identified a number of distinctly different types of this apparently homogenous form. He then examined the conditions under which they were formed, why they emerged in some geographical areas and not in others and the different ways in which they affected the markets they policed. He discusses the importance of these findings for the study of market emergence and transformation and the implications of these findings for entrepreneurs and stakeholders in new market contexts.

Channels of contestation: The impact of stakeholders and auditors on Clean Development Mechanism methodologies and projects

This project examines the genesis of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), established by the United Nations via the Kyoto Protocol to create a market in carbon credits or Certified Emission Reductions (CERS). Markets are traditionally created by actors vying not only for market share but to shape the institutional infrastructure that governs them. Studying the establishment of the CDM with reference to this model of formation can shed light on important issues regarding how regulations, norms and new product categories are established and enforced how resources are allocated, and how competition is initially structured. Two papers will result from this project. One will explore if and how stakeholders influence the approval process of a set of procedures that are core to the development of a new market, and a second will examine the determinants of project approval rates, with a particular focus on the role of third party auditor expertise.

Markus Reitzig
Assistant Professor of Strategic and International Business

Ramon Lecuona
Doctoral Student

Corporate R&D allocations in Systems Industries

The goal of this research project is to better understand how - and why - multi-technology corporations allocate resource and development (R&D) investments across technological landscapes in so-called system industries (i.e. industries in which sets of interrelated components constitute final consumer products). Shedding light on this question is desirable for two reasons. First, scholars of technology and innovation have traditionally depicted the process of creating value through R&D as one of trial and error, one of a dedicated search for solutions to a technological problem or one motivated by learning considerations — whereas basic theory on transaction cost economics and property rights, as well as casuistic empirical evidence on firms’ R&D allocations across value chains, suggest that firms stake strategic R&D positions primarily to capture value from technology.
Second, by studying R&D allocation patterns of multitechnology corporations across technology landscapes, we may offer an interesting way to empirically corroborate untested transaction cost and property rights models which will be helpful for studying the more complex interaction between fully-integrated agents. We will focus on the mobile phone industry (more specifically the handset production sector) between 2000 and 2009, using patenting activity as an indicator for firms’ R&D efforts.

Freek Vermeulen
Associate Professor of Strategic & International Management

The effect of product innovations on firm survival in a high uncertainty environment

In the academic literature on the topic but certainly also in the world of practice several assumptions seem to exist about innovation and its benefits. One major – largely unchallenged – assumption appears to that “innovation is good” (with due exceptions, of course, in the literature). Rather than accept the simplistic view that innovation is beneficial for all firms alike and, hence, all firms should strive to be innovative, in this proposed project, we would like to explore the boundaries of innovation, and under which circumstances innovation might not be beneficial. A better understanding when and for whom innovation is useful – by exploring for who it might not be – would aid the effectiveness of innovation investments.